Category: Contributor’s corner

#Superugby predictions week 6: is quality of opposition relevant?

Our predictions were slightly below-par last weekend, getting 4 of weekend’s 7 games correct. Unfortunately two of our outside bets, the Waratahs and Stormers, ended up on the losing side.

Screen Shot 2015-03-19 at 10.20.38 AM

 

This weekend looks like an interesting bunch of games: the Crusaders and Bulls are favoured to win, by quite a margin and based on any of our criteria, but the rest of the games look much closer. Picking the Sharks to beat the Chiefs is a result of the Sharks hammering the Cheetahs in their last outing, and a bit of South African bias in the Superbru forecasts. Incidentally, we experimented a bit with weighting a team’s performance in the last game by the quality of the opposition faced, as measured by their current log standing. None of the predicted winners of the weekend’s games changed, so we’ve left things as is for now.

Screen Shot 2015-03-19 at 10.20.49 AM

 

 

As always, we’d like to hear your thoughts on the model?

 

SuperRugby Round 3 based on prediction model

Last weekend’s predictions fared a lot better than Round 1. From 1/7 we’ve gone to 4/7. That means by extrapolation this weekend we should get 100%…

Here’s how last weekend’s games happened:

Screen Shot 2015-02-26 at 5.05.19 PM This week the Superbru fan analysis turns up a few interesting results. As expected, there’s a healthy dose of fan bias, but it’s not unanimous: Rebels and Lions fans are actually expecting their teams to lose this weekend.

Screen Shot 2015-02-26 at 5.05.40 PM

Here are the Rugby Scientists’ prediction, triangulated from predictions made from past seasons points tallies, previous game analyses, and adjusted Superbru forecasts. The forecasts make it look like we’re in for a weekend of close games, although for three of the games the margin, form, and Superbru predictions coincide: Hurricanes to beat the Force, Sharks to beat the Bulls, and Stormers to beat the Lions, all away.

Screen Shot 2015-02-26 at 5.06.13 PM

Dr Ian Durbach

(Data supplied by Superbru)

Superugby R2 predictions: will they fare any better than R1?

 

Screen Shot 2015-02-19 at 1.20.47 PM

 

Following on from last week, here is an update from Dr Ian Durbach! Thanks again to Ian for putting the article together and for the data from the guys at Superbru…

Dark days for the Rugby Scientists prediction team this past weekend. In case you missed it, here’s how our predictions fared. Games we got correct are in bold but you won’t need to search too hard – there’s only one.

Screen Shot 2015-02-19 at 1.16.41 PM

There are always going to be some upsets that predictions get wrong, that’s what makes sport exciting to watch. Results like the Rebels win were totally unexpected. Only 2% of Superbru users got that one right, die-hard Rebels fans we’d suspect. Models get their power by being right on average, so we’re hoping ours will bounce back. The fact that the away teams won 6 of the 7 games is something to watch, particularly as home ground advantage plays a strong role in our predictions.

This week we’re adding two new elements to our model. Firstly, the good folks at Superbru have provided us not just with the overall prediction given by their users, but how those predictions differ between fans of the teams involved, and neutrals. From some of our previous research we know that fans tend to overestimate their team’s prospects by about 5 points. That means we can adjust for that bias, as well as the home ground bias we talked about last week, before making our own predictions.

Here’s what Superbru fans expect to happen this weekend. Take a look at how different the forecasts of the two sets of fans are. Nothing like some good old-fashioned fan bias!

Screen Shot 2015-02-19 at 1.16.48 PM

In addition to the new fan predictions, we’ve now got some game results that we can use to take into account a team’s current form. The idea of “form” suggests that teams that win in one week will, on average, tend to keep on winning. Our previous research has suggested that for every 10 points a team wins by in one week, they tend to, on average, win by 2 points the next week. In other words, scoring 10 points this week is “worth” 2 points the next week. Take the upcoming game between the Chiefs and the Brumbies. Both teams won last weekend, the Chiefs by 5, the Brumbies by 44. In making predictions for this week, the Chiefs 5 points are now “worth” 1 point, the Brumbies 44 points are “worth” 9 points. So with just this information we’d predict the Brumbies to beat the Chiefs by 8 points. Of course this is a pretty crude way of making a prediction, but we’ll add it to our existing model and hope it improves our performance!

To recap, our predictions are now made up of three components: predictions made from data on how teams did in previous seasons, which gives an idea of overall team quality; predictions made from recent performances, which tells us about current form, and Superbru predictions, which captures other kinds of information like team selections, injuries, and so on. Our final prediction is an average of these three predictions, let’s hope it does a little better than last week!

Screen Shot 2015-02-19 at 1.16.56 PM

What are your thoughts on our predictions? Are we better off tossing a coin or is there some value in the predictive model proposed in this article?